Palo Alto Dark Skies

Palo Alto’s Night Sky is Fading – Help Strengthen the Dark Sky Ordinance!

Palo Alto City Council will consider adopting a Dark Sky Ordinance on April 7th. The proposed draft ordinance is inadequate and does not address the impacts and concerns associated with light pollution. The proposed ordinance scope is so limited, that it exempts new lighting fixtures on existing buildings and structures, allows excessive light pollution spillage, and could even make things worse by failing to regulate replacements for outdated fixtures.

The proposed ordinance significantly weakens existing light trespass protections. Under the current ordinance, all properties are subject to a standard limiting light trespass to no more than 0.5 foot-candles at the property line. However, the proposed ordinance applies this restriction only to new buildings, major remodels, and lighting systems that require a permit. This means that existing properties would no longer be subject to any enforceable limits on light trespass.

As a result, if this proposal is adopted without change, an existing neighbor could legally install a bright or intrusive light—such as a strobe light—that shines into adjacent properties, without any violation of the ordinance. While good neighborly practices may help mitigate conflicts, this change removes an important safeguard that currently protects all residents from excessive and disruptive lighting.

This creates an uneven playing field where existing properties are exempt from regulations that apply to new developments, potentially leading to increased light pollution and nighttime disturbances in residential areas. Restoring citywide light trespass limits would help ensure that all residents, regardless of when their home was built or last renovated, are protected from intrusive lighting.

Artificial light at night harms environmental and human health

Studies show that even outdoor artificial light at night disrupts sleep, hormone regulation, and overall health. It’s linked to increased risks of breast and prostate cancer, diabetes, heart disease and mood disorders.

Light pollution also disrupts our natural environment. Artificial light at night disorients migrating birds, leading to collisions with buildings, exhaustion, and disrupted navigation. It also alters feeding, mating, and nesting behaviors, threatening bird populations. Light pollution also interferes with animal movement across the landscape and throws off the timing of key ecological processes and behaviors, like when migration or nesting starts, or flowers bloom and when pollinators emerge. decouples critical ecological synchronizations among species, such as time flowers bloom and the time pollinators emerge.

Furthermore, the proposed ordinance allows light spillage equivalent to 50 full moons—far too bright for a city committed to environmental health and sustainability. Our endangered snowy plovers avoid nesting at just 1% of this brightness!

Light pollution wastes energy. It is contrary to sound sustainability principles and to the primary directive of the dark sky of using light only where and when it is needed, at the lowest level needed, and not more.

And last but not least - Light pollution obscures the stars. Seeing the milky way has become a privilege!

What can you do?

The proposed ordinance applies only to new construction and major remodels. Please urge  Mayor Lauing and City Council to:

  • Apply the ordinance to newly installed or replacement lighting fixtures on existing structures, as recommended by the Planning Commission.

  • Set appropriate lights-out (curfew) requirements for outdoor lighting to prevent unnecessary night-time lighting.

  • Prohibit light spillage into homes, parks, and open spaces.

Please note that this ordinance does not apply to street lights, and active enforcement is not expected. The ordinance provides a recourse to residents who are negatively impacted by light pollution.

Please write to the Palo Alto City Council to express your support for this ordinance and ask them to support the bullets listed above. If you have any experience with nuisance light shining through your window and affecting your quality of life, this would be a great opportunity to share your story!

Here is the Palo Alto City Council email address, which you can send your email to.

city.council@CityofPaloAlto.org

Here is an example:

To: city.council@CityofPaloAlto.org

Subject: Please protect our city from light pollution

Dear Mayor Lauing and Palo alto Councilmembers,

My Name is  (enter your name and say a little about yourself and why you care)

Please strengthen the proposed Dark Sky Ordinance, Please ask city staff to

  • Apply the ordinance to newly installed or replacement lighting fixtures on existing structures, as recommended by the Planning Commission.

  • Set appropriate lights-out (curfew) requirements for outdoor lighting to prevent unnecessary night-time lighting.

  • Prohibit light spillage into homes, parks, and open spaces.

Thank you,  [Your name]

You can join the City Council meeting via zoom or in person and give a brief 2-minute public comment:

VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION:

Click here to join

Meeting ID: 362 027 238    

Phone:1(669)900-6833

Meeting Agenda: https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?meetingTemplateId=16024

A dark sky is a shared heritage. Let’s bring back the stars, protect our health, and safeguard wildlife—starting with a stronger Dark Sky Ordinance!

April Updates

Read the Fine Print: 

The Hidden Flexibility of California's Measures

California's ballot measures and propositions, designed to empower citizens, often conceal a crucial truth: the legal text, not the appealing campaign language, ultimately governs fund allocation. Ballot measures are usually crafted based on polls to attract diverse voter interests. By design, they allow flexibility for future adjustments, enabling governing bodies to adapt to evolving needs, or perceived needs, that may be far removed from the original campaign's promises. Voters should be aware that the legal language often allows for significant deviations from the advertised intent.

This inherent flexibility can lead to significant shifts in intended allocations and intense feelings of betrayal among voters. For instance, consider Valley Water’s attempt to shift funds from the “Safe, Clean Water and Natural Flood Protection” program in Palo Alto and Mountain View to San Jose. Similar cases occur statewide, showing how legal loopholes and broad interpretations can reshape the intended purpose of voter-approved measures. Additionally, broad language often permits funds to be used for projects that only marginally meet voters' intent, if at all. For example, a ballot measure that promises to “restore habitat and provide access to nature” might end up spending most of the funds on paved trails and parking areas. 

Identifying the exact legal obligations in ballot measures can be challenging, especially when the language is vague or broad. So, as you read ballot measures before casting your vote, scrutinize the fine print. If the full text states that funds "shall" be used for a specific purpose, that's legally binding. However, if it says "may," "intends to," or uses vague, broad categories, officials have more discretion in how funds are spent. Furthermore, when ballot statements lump two different categories together, the part that attracted your vote may ultimately be sidelined. What you vote for may not always be what you get.

The Crisis Facing Americas Birds

The 2025 U.S. State of the Birds report reveals that bird populations across the United States continue to decline, a trend that has been ongoing for decades. The report shows that a third of American bird species are of high or moderate concern due to population declines or other threats. Birds in forests, grasslands, and arid lands are among the fastest declining groups, with populations dropping by 43% and 41%, respectively, since 1970. Additionally, while waterfowl populations had been increasing, they have now declined by 20% since 2014 due to habitat loss and climate-related factors. With diminishing federal protections of forests, wetlands and grasslands, these trends may deepen and intensify.

Despite these alarming trends, the report also highlights that targeted conservation efforts can lead to recoveries. Protecting bird habitats and reducing threats like habitat loss and environmental degradation are critical for reversing these declines.

Birds are vital to our ecosystems and economy, generating over $350 billion annually through bird-related activities like birdwatching and outdoor recreation. They also contribute to mental well-being, reducing stress and improving life satisfaction. Protecting birds is not only about conservation; it’s about sustaining the health of our environment and ourselves.

As we face the ongoing challenges to bird populations, continued action is necessary to protect birds, restore their habitats, and ensure a future where both birds and nature thrive. SCVBA has been protecting birds and their habitats for 100 years, and we are committed to continuing our advocacy for our feathered friends, who can sing but cannot talk!

Protect San José’s Parks!

Anna’s Hummingbird chicks: Sushanta Bhandarkar

On Tuesday, March 25, 2025, the San José City Council will discuss the Definition of Chartered Parkland under Section 1700 of the City Charter (Agenda Item 7.1, File 25-292). This discussion will help City Staff  determine which city parks receive permanent protection from development or sale without voter approval.

The Santa Clara Valley Bird Alliance supports the staff report’s interpretation and the inclusion of 207 parks in the official Charter Park inventory (Attachment A). This is a critical step to preserve San José’s parks for future generations.

Why is this Important?

 Protects Public Parks Permanently – Ensures parkland remains inalienable unless approved by voters.
 Provides Clarity & Transparency – Establishes a clear, consistent policy on how Charter Park status is determined.
 Supports Wildlife & Green spaces – Parks provide vital habitat, recreation, and climate resilience.
 Aligns with Historical Intent – San José has protected public parklands since 1896, with voters reaffirming these protections in 1965.

How You Can Help:

 Email the City Council – Urge Mayor Matt Mahan and Council members to approve the staff report and protect all eligible parks. Email:  city.clerk@sanjoseca.gov (CC: mayor@sanjoseca.govdistrict2@sanjoseca.govdistrict1@sanjoseca.govdistrict2@sanjoseca.govdistrict3@sanjoseca.govdistrict4@sanjoseca.govdistrict5@sanjoseca.govdistrict6@sanjoseca.govdistrict7@sanjoseca.govdistrict8@sanjoseca.govdistrict9@sanjoseca.govdistrict10@sanjoseca.gov) with the subject, "I Support the Definition of Chartered Parkland (Agenda Item 7.1, File 25-292)". In your email, tell the mayor and council a little about yourself, and ask them to support this protection for our local parks.


 Attend the Council Meeting – Show support in person or via Zoom on March 25 at 6:00 PM Meeting Details

San José’s parks are essential to our community and our environment—let’s ensure they remain protected for the future!

Thank you!

March Updates

Avroh Shah is Bay Nature's 2025 Local Hero Young Leader

Our Environmental Advocacy team is fortunate to work with youth who are passionate, talented, and proactive in their advocacy for nature and the future of our planet. We are very pleased to see our friend Avroh Shah of the Palo Alto Student Climate Coalition selected as Bay Nature's 2025 Young Leader! Avroh brought together a diverse community that together, successfully averted the expansion of the airport into the Palo Alto Baylands, and continues to advocate for the environment.

Avroh will receive an award at Bay Nature’s 15th Local Hero Awards on Sunday, April 6. We hope you will be there to congratulate this outstanding local hero! For more information and to purchase tickets, see Bay Nature Local Hero Event.

Surveys:

  1. Rancho Cañada del Oro Open Space Preserve Regional Trail Planning Survey

The purpose of the Rancho Cañada del Oro Open Space Preserve Regional Trail Planning project is to develop a plan for a trail network on the southern 1,800-acre portion of the Rancho Cañada del Oro Open Space Preserve, including an area formerly known as Blair Ranch. Access could support hiking, camping, mountain biking and horseback riding activities. This trail network would continue regional trail connections from the northern portion of the preserve. 

Please respond to a survey here.

As you reflect on the survey questions, please keep in mind that trail use can place stress on local wildlife, and activities like mountain biking and camping may impact native plants and animal species. Let’s be mindful and tread gently on the land!

2. The Bay Area Air District is asking all those who breathe to take this short survey for their Bay Area Regional Climate Action Plan (BARCAP) Survey today!

They are gathering feedback from Bay Area communities on priorities and concerns regarding regional climate goals and potential strategies and actions. Public input is critical to guiding the priorities for BARCAP development. This survey takes 5-10 minutes to complete. Submit a response for a chance to win one of four $50 Amazon gift cards!

Secure Link

Updates and issues we are working on:

  1. The Burrowing Owls of Shoreline Park

    Phil Higgins,  the Burrowing Owl biologist, remains on Administrative Leave. To fill the gap the city of Mountain View hired consultants who are ensuring that burrowing owls (and other birds) are protected when landfill and other projects take place. Another consulting group works to implement the Burrowing Owl Preservation Plan and the Wildlife Management Plan. In January, there were more than 20 owls at Shoreline.

    We expect many of the owls to leave soon and migrate to their breeding ground up north. Meanwhile, we ask all our members to be careful not to disturb owls, and at the same time be vigilant. Please report any concerns to Advocate@scvbirdalliance.org

  1. Vista Heights / Cupertino

    The Vista Heights project, aiming to build a new subdivision on the  Stevens Creek canyon rim, has met a red light. The City of Cupertino has deemed the project’s Builder’s Remedy application was incomplete and therefore, the City is no longer processing this application. However, the immense damage caused to the landscape of this property remains a gaping injury. The City required the project applicant, Mr. Chen, to submit a "Retroactive Grading Permit" for remediation/restoration of the immense damage to the hill. The deadline for this permit application has passed, and Cuopertino has issued a Notice of Violation. We continue to follow this project.

  2. Shoreline Protection (Sea Level Rise) in Palo Alto and Mountain View

    In November 2020, Santa Clara County voters approved Valley Water’s Safe, Clean Water and Natural Flood Protection Ballot Measure which included Project E7: San Francisco Bay Shoreline Project. This project, a multi-agency effort between the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Valley Water, the California State Coastal Conservancy, and regional stakeholders, aims to provide tidal flood protection, restore and enhance tidal marsh and related habitats, and improve recreational and public access along Santa Clara County's shoreline.

    Phase I levees (Alviso) are currently in construction. However, as costs escalate, Valley Water seeks to divert funds from Phase II (Palo Alto/Mountain View) to Phase I. This is of concern, because the Army Corps has decided not to provide funding to Phase I and so without funding from the approved ballot measure,  this area of our county - including baylands and critical  infrastructure - will remain unprotected for decades.

    We asked the Valley Water Board of Directors to:

● Preserve Safe, Clean Water and Natural Flood Protection Project E7 funding for

Phase II rather than reallocating it to other geographical areas.

● Retain the stated benefits of Project E7, including restoring 400 acres of tidal marsh

and related habitats in the Palo Alto/Mountain View area and protect critical structures, such as the Regional Water Quality Control Plant.

● Maintain the ability to use Project funds for design and construction to support

resilience efforts in these areas.

● Revise the Control Process Update to ensure robust outreach and engagement well in

advance of required public hearings.